But the Acela is Amtrak's only profit-maker, with an average profit per passenger of $41. Amtrak's other lines lose an average of $32 per passenger.
For all that, Bombardier looks on the U.S. as only a "medium-term possibility" for revenue gains. In countries like China and France, Bombardier deals with one decision maker, the central government along with a state-owned transport authority.
In the U.S., 24 states are clamouring for high-speed rail funds – a promising sign of interest, to be sure, but a reminder of the labours of dealing with multiple levels of bureaucracy. Republicans in those states have balked at the proposed expenditure. And train buff Obama will be in office, at most, for only seven more years. After that, who knows?
The decades-long wait for high-speed rail in central Canada proves the same point, that commitment to passenger rail – high-speed or conventional – remains far stronger outside North America.
http://www.thestar.com/business/article/744697--olive-bombardier-is-on-the-right-track
won't i get dizzy on such a high speed train? could you have a doctor recommend this?
ReplyDeleteYou will have no problem on high-speed rail. I have traveled on the TGV in France and the Eurostar between England and France, both so smooth that car attendants are casually pouring hot coffee from carts while the train is traveling at close to 200 mph. High-speed rail is THE answer to much of America's transportation needs.
ReplyDelete